Assessment of utilization of ChatGPT on Medical Research Paper Writing Practices amongst University students in Lahore, Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47489/szmc.v40i3.961Keywords:
ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, Medical Research Writing, Academic Writing, Medical Education, Academic integrity, Research ProductivityAbstract
Background :The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic applications has transformed medical research writing. ChatGPT is an AI-based language model that has been introduced by Open AI. It is been commonly used for literature review, manuscript organization, and writing research papers and articles.
Objective: To assess utilization of ChatGPT on medical research writing practices among university students.
Method: An analytical cross- sectional study conducted among university student of The University of Lahore and Rashid Latif Khan University. The study participants were split into 3 groups on the basis of their enrolled degree programs; MBBS, BDS and Allied health sciences (undergraduate, graduate and post-graduate students). Duration of study was from January 2025 to June 2025. Descriptive statistics, frequencies, percentages, and cross-tabulations were employed to summarize the demographic features. For inferential testing, statistical tests were used to investigate the relationship between the question variable utilization of ChatGPT and Chi-square (?²) tests were used to detect relationships between categorical variables. Following an extensive study of the literature, a questionnaire was prepared. Total of 381 students were selected according to sample size. A sample of 381 students was selected using non probability convenience sampling technique. A self-constructed online validated questionnaire was used.
Results: Among 381 participants, 81.9% of participants agreed that it improved their academic writing. A majority of respondents (92.1%) found it is easy to comprehend difficult ideas. Furthermore, 74.0% found that it helped them to organize their ideas while writing research papers. In addition, 79.0% students felt that it improved their ability to research independently. However, 70.9% students said inaccuracies were present in ChatGPT’s results. 50.1% agreed to use the text generated by ChatGPT without further validation.
Conclusion: ChatGPT enhances enrolled university students’ academic writing, manuscript structure, conceptual understanding, time management, productivity and critical thinking. However, due to risks of inaccuracies and ethical concerns, its use must involve human oversight, verification, and adherence to academic integrity.
References
Doyal AS, et al. ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in medical writing: concerns and ethical considerations. Cureus. 2023;15(8). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43292.
Lee PY, et al. Use of ChatGPT in medical research and scientific writing. Malays Fam Physician. 2023;18:58. https://doi.org/10.51866/cm0006.
Boscardin CK, et al. ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence for medical education: potential impact and opportunity. Acad Med. 2024;99(1):22–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005439.
Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(6):887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887.
Dave T, Athaluri SA, Singh S. ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations. Front Artif Intell. 2023;6:1169595. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1169595.
Ruksakulpiwat S, Kumar A, Ajibade A. Using ChatGPT in medical research: current status and future directions. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023:1513–1520. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S413470.
Curtis N. To ChatGPT or not to ChatGPT? The impact of artificial intelligence on academic publishing. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2023;42(4):275. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000003852.
Lingard L. Writing with ChatGPT: an illustration of its capacity, limitations and implications for academic writers. Perspect Med Educ. 2023;12(1):261–270. https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1072.
Salvagno M, Taccone FS, Gerli AG. Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Crit Care. 2023;27(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2.
Mahmood S, Khan MO, Hameed I. With great power comes great responsibility—deductions of using ChatGPT for medical research. EXCLI J. 2023;22:499. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2023-6163.
Ullah Makhdoom A, et al. Exploring perceptions and experiences of ChatGPT in medical education: a qualitative study among undergraduate and postgraduate students. Gomal J Med Sci. 2025;23(4). https://doi.org/10.46903/gjms/23.4.2128.
Pallivathukal RG, et al. ChatGPT for academic purposes: survey among undergraduate healthcare students in Malaysia. Cureus. 2024;16(1). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.53032.
Gao CA, et al. Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers. NPJ Digit Med. 2023;6(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6.
Bhargava DC, et al. ChatGPT in medical research: challenging time ahead. Med Leg J. 2023;91(4):223–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/00258172231184548.
Biswas S. ChatGPT and the future of medical writing. Radiology. 2023;307(2). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.223312.
Kitamura FC. ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment. Radiology. 2023;307(2). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230171.
Wooldridge M. A brief history of artificial intelligence: what it is, where we are, and where we are going. New York: Flatiron Books; 2021.
Haenlein M, Kaplan A. A brief history of artificial intelligence: on the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. Calif Manage Rev. 2019;61(4):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925.
Bhullar PS, Joshi M, Chugh R. ChatGPT in higher education—a synthesis of the literature and a future research agenda. Educ Inf Technol. 2024;29(16):21501–21522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12723-x.
Cascella M, et al. Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare: an analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios. J Med Syst. 2023;47(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-01925-4.
Moorhouse BL, Yeo MA, Wan Y. Generative AI tools and assessment: guidelines of the world's top-ranking universities. Comput Educ Open. 2023;5:100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151.
Rasul T, et al. The role of ChatGPT in higher education: benefits, challenges, and future research directions. J Appl Learn Teach. 2023;6(1):41–56. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29.
Abd-Alrazaq A, et al. Large language models in medical education: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/48291.
Koivisto M, Grassini S. Best humans still outperform artificial intelligence in a creative divergent thinking task. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):13601. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40858-3.
Guo AA, Li J. Harnessing the power of ChatGPT in medical education. Med Teach. 2023;45(9):1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2198094.
Ray PP. ChatGPT: a comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet Things Cyber Phys Syst. 2023;3:121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003.
This work is licensed under a 